Atomic Tango

Mean Girls of Facebook: An Anthropologie Lesson

August 15th, 2011 · 6 Comments · Case Studies, Fashion

by Freddy J. Nager, Founder of Atomic Tango LLC

Anthropologie Model

Model behavior at Anthropologie?

Now that I’ve taken a stab at Banana Republic’s Mad Men promotion, time to look at what’s happening in fashion retail for women.

Surprisingly, it ain’t pretty…

My wife LOVES Anthropologie (I should invest in the parent company just to get some cash back), and she follows it with a religious fervor. Her devotion entails keeping tabs on Anthropologie in social media, and from what she tells me, Anthropologie sure knows how to work it.

Sort of.

Enter the Queen B’s (i.e., Bloggers)

Part of Anthropologie’s social media strategy involves bloggers — more like acolytes whose fanaticism makes Apple fanboys look apathetic. The top bloggers include Roxy of Effortless Anthropologie and Tara B of Little Girl Big Closet.

Anthropologie itself doesn’t blog. Why bother, when these third-party die-hards hang on the brand’s every word and whisper, review every product release, and work their networks until EVERYONE knows what’s happening at their favorite cult, er, store.

These bloggers also constitute a continuous focus group of informed and influential top customers. They point out what fits right, what lacks in quality, and most importantly, what’s straying from the brand. Since they don’t have jobs at Anthropologie at stake, these independent bloggers serve as more objective brand watchdogs than Anthropolgie’s internal employees, and their constructive criticism helps the company shape its practices and product lines. According to my wife, this feedback apparently influenced Anthopologie’s coming fall collection.

Other brands can only dream of such social support: despite hiring gurus and drinking Kool-Aid with the Word of Mouth Marketing Association, they’re lucky if anyone gives a tweet.

Roxy of Endless Anthropologie

Photo of Roxy by Roxy of Endless Anthropologie

Fully aware of the value of these faithful fashionistas, Anthropologie hasn’t let their dedication go unrewarded. Indeed, the company recently held a special blogger-only event in NYC dubbed Color + Print. There the bloggers got a first look at Anthropologie’s fall line, met royalty (the design team), and best of all, tried on the clothes. Roxy of Effortless Anthropologie described it in her post:

“… oh yeah, this wasn’t a buyer event, it was a blogger event. Anthropologie rolled out the abstract red print carpet for us. There was clothing and accessories. There were personal stylists on-hand to help us create a look. There were hair artisans and makeup artists to give us a boost. And then there was a photo booth where we could get our picture taken. Those photos will be up on Anthropologie’s Facebook page today…”

You could say that such an “appreciation event” skirts FTC rules about bribing bloggers, but Corporate America has been feting pseudo-journalists for years (see “The Hollywood Foreign Press Association” behind the Golden Globe Awards), so this is just business as usual with a 2.0 twist. It’s a clever way to tap the power of influencers.

So what’s the problem? Well, you know that bit about Facebook up there?

Imagine what happens when a fashion brand favors one group of customers over everyone else in a social medium…

Yes, the claws came out.

While most of the comments on Anthropologie’s Facebook page referred to the fashions, others savaged the bloggers — not about their opinions or privileges, but about the way they looked. Really. As in digs about their weight and facial features. While, sadly, this total lack of civility is almost expected these days in America, what particularly galled my wife and others was that Anthropologie did nothing about it. While the company answered questions about the clothing and its availability, they left the ad hominem insults untouched.

Tara B of Little Girl Big Closet

Tara B of Little Girl Big Closet

In an eloquent riposte to Anthropologie, Tara B of Little Girl Big Closet vented her disgust at this cyberbullying — and Anthropolopie’s lack of action:

“I scrolled through the comments and saw some of the most vile, hateful, hurtful words I’ve ever had the misfortune of encountering in all my time as a style blogger. The vast majority of the negative comments were gratuitously malicious, and could in no way be interpreted as constructive criticism. As I kept reading, it felt like someone had just punched me in the gut. People were not only bashing Anthro clothing in general, but tearing down real women who had come out to support your business. It was just disgusting. I can’t begin to understand why you would put all these wonderful women out there and indiscriminately invite the world to comment on them, and not exercise an ounce of moderation. Why didn’t you protect these young women who were kind enough to model your wares for you? Why didn’t you protect the feelings of patrons such as myself who actually happen to like your ‘gross’ ‘grandma clothes’? Why didn’t you delete the comments that were especially vindictive and hateful, with a warning to the authors of those comments (I saw several repeat offenders)? If all you wanted was to run a contest wherein people would vote for their favorites, why didn’t you simply allow Likes, and disallow comments? There are so many different ways in which this could have been handled. I am all for freedom of speech, and think that people who absolutely hate Anthro should have just as loud a voice as those who love it. But free speech mustn’t be confused with abusive rhetoric whose sole discernible purpose is to denigrate.”

She’s completely right.

Censorship and Social Media

There’s this naïve belief pushed by social media gurus that all posts are sacrosanct — that “in the spirit of social media,” censorship is what’s evil, and that neither corporations nor individuals should touch or delete any comment or post, with the exception of spam.

I’ve always responded to this notion with a “B” and a mighty big “S.”

Your social media platform, whether it’s a blog, Facebook page or YouTube video wall, is not democracy square; it’s your island dictatorship. (Or, more exactly, your walled garden within Mark Zuckerberg’s island dictatorship.)

More importantly, it’s part of your brand, and what you allow others to say alongside your brand reflects on it. Would you give your enemies, random trolls, ex-employees and current competitors an open microphone in your physical space? Just as a restaurant owner wouldn’t tolerate a ranting, raving patron for very long, neither should you feel obligated to allow someone on your social turf to rant and rave.

Indeed, as Anthropologie discovered, allowing abusive rhetoric can be far more damaging than blocking it. Allowing cyberbullies to attack your most devoted and influential customers is bad business on many levels — it could even lead to a lawsuit from the victimized.

Although late to this realization, Anthropologie to its credit eventually deleted the offensive comments and issued the following statement on their Facebook page:

“Thanks to those who kindly voted…notice we said ‘kindly.’ We’re disheartened some chose to make unkind comments about the participating bloggers. To not like our fashion is one thing but to be rude to fellow women is uncalled for. (We hold you to higher standards!) One last note: to the 23 gals who gracefully accepted our styling challenge, we say ‘brava!’ Nothing can take away the fun we had, nor inhibit your fearless style!”

The statement worked, eliciting over 420 “likes” and 60 positive comments from devotees (including my wife, who kept me posted on every post). That’s at least 420 customers who were upset by the transgressions.

In sum, social media can effectively and even enjoyably promote a brand, but like any public medium, it must be monitored and moderated. While we marketers love to create edgy, provocative campaigns that “push the envelope,” the presence of malice is never fashionable.

Update 9/15/2011: And the hits just keep a’coming… There’s more tumult in Anthropologie blogger land, as Kim of the once-popular blog Anthroholic has been accused of taking the money of her followers to do “personal shopping” and not fulfilling her end of the deal. Tara B of Little Girl Big Closet describes the incident (and the dark side of shopping addiction) in an article entitled “Breaking the Silence.”  And here’s a related (and useful) article by Roxy of Effortless Anthropologie that’s already generated over 600 comments: “Alert! Protecting yourself from online transaction scams.”

Tags: ··········

6 Comments so far ↓

  • Michael Bean

    This was a great read Freddy. Perhaps my favorite post of yours in a long time. You hit on all sorts of interesting and key points that I reflect on frequently as a blogger. The protection of the ‘brand’ by moderating comments was particularly spot on. Good stuff.

  • Tara B.

    Very well-written post. Thanks for the shout-out ^^

  • Jay @hautepop

    I’ve been recommending a client to take more of this “island dictatorship” approach to their Facebook page (though I didn’t phrase it that way!) and they just acted on it this week – good stuff :)

    Any “social media gurus” arguing that “all posts are sacrosanct” have obviously never been on forums, or Usenet, or in fact any real social media community of discussion at all. (Though has anyone really argued this? Much as I hate the word ‘guru’, most aren’t as bad as all that!)

    Moderating to maintain civility and fight the inevitable trolls is a universal essential, and declaring boundaries and social norms for a community in this way is hardly censorship. It’s just a question brands have to ask: “Is this appropriate for here? For us? For now?”

    Freddy’s Comment: Thanks for the comment, Jay! In answer to your question, I briefly worked for a social media company in Silicon Valley, and the senior management team would not allow us to moderate user comments, even racist or sexist ones. They said that they didn’t believe in censorship because it violated the “spirit of social media.” So, yes, such naive people do exist — and are running companies.

  • Rick Sanchez

    Great article. My wife (Also a Tara) is also heavily invested in a couple of fashion blogs.

    We met with the owners of the youlookfab.com blog a couple of months ago and discussed this very issue. They learned early and quickly what can happen if you let comments get away from you and how it can negatively affect your brand.

    Since then they have taken steps to constantly improve the moderation, rules of conduct, privacy and permission awareness of their site.

  • Laura

    I’m a very all Anthr Blogger in an area where there are no stores. I rely heavily on my fellow bloggers as do my readers to help locate difficult to find items in stores. Although I am a top 10 online reviewer. I knew about the FB challenge, but did not participate or comment. My blog is listed on Roxy’s Side Bar. Last Thursday night I was cyberbullied directly on my blog. I did delete the comment although I followed through by calling out the miscreant. I had no clue that this had occurred on FB. I want to thank your supportive words. I accidentally stumbled haphazardly onto your post. It was well work a good crash to read.

Leave a Comment